English Bridge Union Pairs A Final Multisection Session 3 Section A Top = 26
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4S-1 E 50 17 9 Wren & Perryman Woo & Woo
2 2 4S-2 E 100 24 2 Wilson S & Gore Smith & Maggs
3 3 3S-1 E 50 17 9 Anderson & Martin Schogger & Paul
4 4 3S= E -140 9 17 Dunn & Ewart Harper & Hoffman
5 5 4S-1 E 50 17 9 King & Panahpour Burrows & Burrows
6 6 3NT-2 E 100 24 2 Smith & Smith Willis & Lewis
7 7 4S= E -420 1 25 Hedley & Hedley Lee & Poole
8 8 3S= E -140 9 17 Lonsdale & Wilkes Pryor & Pryor
9 9 3S= E -140 9 17 Sheehan & Clews Stelmashenko & Milman
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 1 4H= E -420 12 14 Wren & Perryman Woo & Woo
2 2 4H= E -420 12 14 Wilson S & Gore Smith & Maggs
3 3 4H= E -420 12 14 Anderson & Martin Schogger & Paul
4 4 4H= E -420 12 14 Dunn & Ewart Harper & Hoffman
5 5 4H= E -420 12 14 King & Panahpour Burrows & Burrows
6 6 4H= E -420 12 14 Smith & Smith Willis & Lewis
7 7 3NT= S 600 26 0 Hedley & Hedley Lee & Poole
8 8 4H= W -420 12 14 Lonsdale & Wilkes Pryor & Pryor
9 9 4H= E -420 12 14 Sheehan & Clews Stelmashenko & Milman
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 9 4S+2 E -680 4 22 Wren & Perryman Stelmashenko & Milman
2 1 4S+2 W -680 4 22 Wilson S & Gore Woo & Woo
3 2 5S= E -650 18 8 Anderson & Martin Smith & Maggs
4 3 5S= E -650 18 8 Dunn & Ewart Schogger & Paul
5 4 4S+1 E -650 18 8 King & Panahpour Harper & Hoffman
6 5 4S+1 E -650 18 8 Smith & Smith Burrows & Burrows
7 6 4S+1 E -650 18 8 Hedley & Hedley Willis & Lewis
8 7 4S+1 E -650 18 8 Lonsdale & Wilkes Lee & Poole
9 8 4S+2 E -680 4 22 Sheehan & Clews Pryor & Pryor
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 9 4H-1 E 100 20 6 Wren & Perryman Stelmashenko & Milman
2 1 4H-2 W 200 26 0 Wilson S & Gore Woo & Woo
3 2 3H= W -140 14 12 Anderson & Martin Smith & Maggs
4 3 3Sx-3 N -800 0 26 Dunn & Ewart Schogger & Paul
5 4 4H-1 E 100 20 6 King & Panahpour Harper & Hoffman
6 5 4H-1 W 100 20 6 Smith & Smith Burrows & Burrows
7 6 4H-1 W 100 20 6 Hedley & Hedley Willis & Lewis
8 7 4H-1 W 100 20 6 Lonsdale & Wilkes Lee & Poole
9 8 4H= W -620 8 18 Sheehan & Clews Pryor & Pryor
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 8 3NT+2 N 660 12 14 Wren & Perryman Pryor & Pryor
2 9 3NT+3 N 690 19 7 Wilson S & Gore Stelmashenko & Milman
3 1 6NT= N 1440 24 2 Anderson & Martin Woo & Woo
4 2 6NT-3 N -300 0 26 Dunn & Ewart Smith & Maggs
5 3 6NT-1 N -100 4 22 King & Panahpour Schogger & Paul
6 4 6NT-1 N -100 4 22 Smith & Smith Harper & Hoffman
7 5 6NT= N 1440 24 2 Hedley & Hedley Burrows & Burrows
8 6 4NT+1 N 660 12 14 Lonsdale & Wilkes Willis & Lewis
9 7 4NT+1 N 660 12 14 Sheehan & Clews Lee & Poole
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 8 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Wren & Perryman Pryor & Pryor
2 9 4H-1 S -50 0 26 Wilson S & Gore Stelmashenko & Milman
3 1 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Anderson & Martin Woo & Woo
4 2 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Dunn & Ewart Smith & Maggs
5 3 2H+1 N 140 3 23 King & Panahpour Schogger & Paul
6 4 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Smith & Smith Harper & Hoffman
7 5 2H+1 S 140 3 23 Hedley & Hedley Burrows & Burrows
8 6 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Lonsdale & Wilkes Willis & Lewis
9 7 4H= S 420 24 2 Sheehan & Clews Lee & Poole
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 7 3NT+3 W -690 10 16 Wren & Perryman Lee & Poole
2 8 4H+2 W -680 12 14 Wilson S & Gore Pryor & Pryor
3 9 6H-1 E 100 24 2 Anderson & Martin Stelmashenko & Milman
4 1 6H= E -1430 4 22 Dunn & Ewart Woo & Woo
5 2 6H-1 E 100 24 2 King & Panahpour Smith & Maggs
6 3 4H= W -620 20 6 Smith & Smith Schogger & Paul
7 4 3NT+2 W -660 14 12 Hedley & Hedley Harper & Hoffman
8 5 4H+1 E -650 17 9 Lonsdale & Wilkes Burrows & Burrows
9 6 6H= E -1430 4 22 Sheehan & Clews Willis & Lewis
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 7 6Sx-2 N -300 3 23 Wren & Perryman Lee & Poole
2 8 5Cx-2 W 300 22 4 Wilson S & Gore Pryor & Pryor
3 9 5Cx= W -550 0 26 Anderson & Martin Stelmashenko & Milman
4 1 7Sx-2 N -300 3 23 Dunn & Ewart Woo & Woo
5 2 6Dx-2 E 300 22 4 King & Panahpour Smith & Maggs
6 3 5S-1 N -50 10 16 Smith & Smith Schogger & Paul
7 4 5S= N 450 26 0 Hedley & Hedley Harper & Hoffman
8 5 6Cx-1 E 100 16 10 Lonsdale & Wilkes Burrows & Burrows
9 6 5S-1 N -50 10 16 Sheehan & Clews Willis & Lewis
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 6 4H= W -620 6 20 Wren & Perryman Willis & Lewis
2 7 4H-1 E 100 25 1 Wilson S & Gore Lee & Poole
3 8 3H+1 E -170 20 6 Anderson & Martin Pryor & Pryor
4 9 4H-1 W 100 25 1 Dunn & Ewart Stelmashenko & Milman
5 1 4H= E -620 6 20 King & Panahpour Woo & Woo
6 2 3NT= E -600 15 11 Smith & Smith Smith & Maggs
7 3 4H= E -620 6 20 Hedley & Hedley Schogger & Paul
8 4 1H+3 E -170 20 6 Lonsdale & Wilkes Harper & Hoffman
9 5 4H= E -620 6 20 Sheehan & Clews Burrows & Burrows
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 6 3H+2 E -200 26 0 Wren & Perryman Willis & Lewis
2 7 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Wilson S & Gore Lee & Poole
3 8 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Anderson & Martin Pryor & Pryor
4 9 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Dunn & Ewart Stelmashenko & Milman
5 1 5H= E -650 12 14 King & Panahpour Woo & Woo
6 2 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Smith & Smith Smith & Maggs
7 3 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Hedley & Hedley Schogger & Paul
8 4 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Lonsdale & Wilkes Harper & Hoffman
9 5 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Sheehan & Clews Burrows & Burrows
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 5 4H+2 S 480 21 5 Wren & Perryman Burrows & Burrows
2 6 2S= W -110 0 26 Wilson S & Gore Willis & Lewis
3 7 4H+1 N 450 13 13 Anderson & Martin Lee & Poole
4 8 3S-1 W 50 4 22 Dunn & Ewart Pryor & Pryor
5 9 4S-2 E 100 7 19 King & Panahpour Stelmashenko & Milman
6 1 5H+1 N 480 21 5 Smith & Smith Woo & Woo
7 2 5Dx-3 E 500 26 0 Hedley & Hedley Smith & Maggs
8 3 4H+2 S 480 21 5 Lonsdale & Wilkes Schogger & Paul
9 4 4S-2 W 100 7 19 Sheehan & Clews Harper & Hoffman
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 5 6D-1 W 50 26 0 Wren & Perryman Burrows & Burrows
2 6 3NT+1 E -430 13 13 Wilson S & Gore Willis & Lewis
3 7 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Anderson & Martin Lee & Poole
4 8 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Dunn & Ewart Pryor & Pryor
5 9 3NT+1 E -430 13 13 King & Panahpour Stelmashenko & Milman
6 1 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Smith & Smith Woo & Woo
7 2 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Hedley & Hedley Smith & Maggs
8 3 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Lonsdale & Wilkes Schogger & Paul
9 4 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Sheehan & Clews Harper & Hoffman
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 4 4S= E -620 11 15 Wren & Perryman Harper & Hoffman
2 5 4S= E -620 11 15 Wilson S & Gore Burrows & Burrows
3 6 4S= W -620 11 15 Anderson & Martin Willis & Lewis
4 7 4S= E -620 11 15 Dunn & Ewart Lee & Poole
5 8 4H= E -620 11 15 King & Panahpour Pryor & Pryor
6 9 4S= E -620 11 15 Smith & Smith Stelmashenko & Milman
7 1 3S+1 E -170 25 1 Hedley & Hedley Woo & Woo
8 2 4S= W -620 11 15 Lonsdale & Wilkes Smith & Maggs
9 3 4S= E -620 11 15 Sheehan & Clews Schogger & Paul
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 4 5C= N 400 24 2 Wren & Perryman Harper & Hoffman
2 5 4S-2 W 100 17 9 Wilson S & Gore Burrows & Burrows
3 6 4S-2 E 100 17 9 Anderson & Martin Willis & Lewis
4 7 3S+1 W -170 0 26 Dunn & Ewart Lee & Poole
5 8 3S-1 E 50 8 18 King & Panahpour Pryor & Pryor
6 9 4C= N 130 22 4 Smith & Smith Stelmashenko & Milman
7 1 3S-1 W 50 8 18 Hedley & Hedley Woo & Woo
8 2 4S-2 W 100 17 9 Lonsdale & Wilkes Smith & Maggs
9 3 4S-1 W 50 8 18 Sheehan & Clews Schogger & Paul
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 3 4S+1 S 650 19 7 Wren & Perryman Schogger & Paul
2 4 4S= S 620 13 13 Wilson S & Gore Harper & Hoffman
3 5 5Hx-1 W 100 7 19 Anderson & Martin Burrows & Burrows
4 6 4H= W -420 1 25 Dunn & Ewart Willis & Lewis
5 7 5Sx-1 N -200 4 22 King & Panahpour Lee & Poole
6 8 4S= S 620 13 13 Smith & Smith Pryor & Pryor
7 9 5Hx-1 W 100 7 19 Hedley & Hedley Stelmashenko & Milman
8 1 4H= W -420 1 25 Lonsdale & Wilkes Woo & Woo
9 2 4S= S 620 13 13 Sheehan & Clews Smith & Maggs
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 3 4S+1 S 450 22 4 Wren & Perryman Schogger & Paul
2 4 4S= N 420 8 18 Wilson S & Gore Harper & Hoffman
3 5 4S+1 N 450 22 4 Anderson & Martin Burrows & Burrows
4 6 4S= S 420 8 18 Dunn & Ewart Willis & Lewis
5 7 4S+1 N 450 22 4 King & Panahpour Lee & Poole
6 8 3NT+1 N 430 16 10 Smith & Smith Pryor & Pryor
7 9 3NT= N 400 0 26 Hedley & Hedley Stelmashenko & Milman
8 1 4S= N 420 8 18 Lonsdale & Wilkes Woo & Woo
9 2 4S+1 N 450 22 4 Sheehan & Clews Smith & Maggs
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 2 4H-1 S -50 7 19 Wren & Perryman Smith & Maggs
2 3 4Hx-1 S -100 2 24 Wilson S & Gore Schogger & Paul
3 4 4H+1 S 450 20 6 Anderson & Martin Harper & Hoffman
4 5 3S-3 W 150 15 11 Dunn & Ewart Burrows & Burrows
5 6 4H= N 420 18 8 King & Panahpour Willis & Lewis
6 7 4Hx= S 590 24 2 Smith & Smith Lee & Poole
7 8 4Hx-1 S -100 2 24 Hedley & Hedley Pryor & Pryor
8 9 4Hx+1 S 690 26 0 Lonsdale & Wilkes Stelmashenko & Milman
9 1 4Hx-1 S -100 2 24 Sheehan & Clews Woo & Woo
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 2 5H= W -450 8 18 Wren & Perryman Smith & Maggs
2 3 6H= W -980 0 26 Wilson S & Gore Schogger & Paul
3 4 6C-1 E 50 19 7 Anderson & Martin Harper & Hoffman
4 5 5NT= E -460 4 22 Dunn & Ewart Burrows & Burrows
5 6 4H+1 E -450 8 18 King & Panahpour Willis & Lewis
6 7 6H-1 W 50 19 7 Smith & Smith Lee & Poole
7 8 6H-1 W 50 19 7 Hedley & Hedley Pryor & Pryor
8 9 4H+1 W -450 8 18 Lonsdale & Wilkes Stelmashenko & Milman
9 1 6NT-1 E 50 19 7 Sheehan & Clews Woo & Woo
Session 3 Section B Top = 26
Board 1
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 4 3NT-2 E 100 24 2 Moore & Serby Solomon & Solomon
7 6 4S= E -420 1 25 Strachan & Carter Ledger & Hannah
10 8 3S+1 E -170 4 22 Thomas & Goodman Tomlinson & Lawy
3 9 3S= E -140 9 17 Stock & Silverstone Liew & Grant
5 1 4S-1 E 50 17 9 Oakford & Oakford Thrower & Miller
Board 2
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
2 4 4H= E -420 12 14 Moore & Serby Solomon & Solomon
7 6 4H= E -420 12 14 Strachan & Carter Ledger & Hannah
10 8 4H= E -420 12 14 Thomas & Goodman Tomlinson & Lawy
3 9 4H= E -420 12 14 Stock & Silverstone Liew & Grant
5 1 4H= W -420 12 14 Oakford & Oakford Thrower & Miller
Board 3
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 5 4S+1 W -650 18 8 Stock & Silverstone Oakford & Oakford
8 7 4S+2 E -680 4 22 Tomlinson & Lawy Strachan & Carter
10 9 4S+1 E -650 18 8 Thomas & Goodman Liew & Grant
4 1 5S+1 E -680 4 22 Solomon & Solomon Thrower & Miller
6 2 4S+1 E -650 18 8 Ledger & Hannah Moore & Serby
Board 4
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
3 5 3NT+1 W -630 3 23 Stock & Silverstone Oakford & Oakford
8 7 3NT+1 W -630 3 23 Tomlinson & Lawy Strachan & Carter
10 9 2Sx-1 N -200 12 14 Thomas & Goodman Liew & Grant
4 1 4H= W -620 8 18 Solomon & Solomon Thrower & Miller
6 2 4H= W -620 8 18 Ledger & Hannah Moore & Serby
Board 5
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 6 6C-1 S -100 4 22 Solomon & Solomon Ledger & Hannah
9 8 4NT+1 N 660 12 14 Liew & Grant Tomlinson & Lawy
10 1 6NT= N 1440 24 2 Thomas & Goodman Thrower & Miller
5 2 3NT+3 N 690 19 7 Oakford & Oakford Moore & Serby
7 3 3NT+2 S 660 12 14 Strachan & Carter Stock & Silverstone
Board 6
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
4 6 3H+2 S 200 20 6 Solomon & Solomon Ledger & Hannah
9 8 4H= S 420 24 2 Liew & Grant Tomlinson & Lawy
10 1 4H= S 420 24 2 Thomas & Goodman Thrower & Miller
5 2 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Oakford & Oakford Moore & Serby
7 3 2H+2 S 170 12 14 Strachan & Carter Stock & Silverstone
Board 7
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 7 6H= W -1430 4 22 Oakford & Oakford Strachan & Carter
1 9 6NT-1 W 100 24 2 Thrower & Miller Liew & Grant
10 2 6H= W -1430 4 22 Thomas & Goodman Moore & Serby
6 3 4H+1 W -650 17 9 Ledger & Hannah Stock & Silverstone
8 4 6H= W -1430 4 22 Tomlinson & Lawy Solomon & Solomon
Board 8
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
5 7 6S-2 N -100 6 20 Oakford & Oakford Strachan & Carter
1 9 5S-1 N -50 10 16 Thrower & Miller Liew & Grant
10 2 5Dx-1 E 100 16 10 Thomas & Goodman Moore & Serby
6 3 7Dx-2 E 300 22 4 Ledger & Hannah Stock & Silverstone
8 4 6Cx-1 E 100 16 10 Tomlinson & Lawy Solomon & Solomon
Board 9
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 8 3H+1 E -170 20 6 Ledger & Hannah Tomlinson & Lawy
2 1 4H= E -620 6 20 Moore & Serby Thrower & Miller
10 3 4H= E -620 6 20 Thomas & Goodman Stock & Silverstone
7 4 3NT= E -600 15 11 Strachan & Carter Solomon & Solomon
9 5 4H= E -620 6 20 Liew & Grant Oakford & Oakford
Board 10
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
6 8 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Ledger & Hannah Tomlinson & Lawy
2 1 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Moore & Serby Thrower & Miller
10 3 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Thomas & Goodman Stock & Silverstone
7 4 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Strachan & Carter Solomon & Solomon
9 5 4H+1 E -650 12 14 Liew & Grant Oakford & Oakford
Board 11
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 9 4H+2 N 480 21 5 Strachan & Carter Liew & Grant
3 2 5H-1 N -50 2 24 Stock & Silverstone Moore & Serby
10 4 4H+1 N 450 13 13 Thomas & Goodman Solomon & Solomon
8 5 4H+1 N 450 13 13 Tomlinson & Lawy Oakford & Oakford
1 6 4H+1 N 450 13 13 Thrower & Miller Ledger & Hannah
Board 12
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
7 9 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Strachan & Carter Liew & Grant
3 2 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Stock & Silverstone Moore & Serby
10 4 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Thomas & Goodman Solomon & Solomon
8 5 3NT+1 W -430 13 13 Tomlinson & Lawy Oakford & Oakford
1 6 3NT+2 W -460 0 26 Thrower & Miller Ledger & Hannah
Board 13
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 1 4S= W -620 11 15 Tomlinson & Lawy Thrower & Miller
4 3 4S= E -620 11 15 Solomon & Solomon Stock & Silverstone
10 5 4S= W -620 11 15 Thomas & Goodman Oakford & Oakford
9 6 2S+2 E -170 25 1 Liew & Grant Ledger & Hannah
2 7 4S= E -620 11 15 Moore & Serby Strachan & Carter
Board 14
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
8 1 5Cx= N 550 26 0 Tomlinson & Lawy Thrower & Miller
4 3 3S-1 W 50 8 18 Solomon & Solomon Stock & Silverstone
10 5 5Cx-1 N -100 2 24 Thomas & Goodman Oakford & Oakford
9 6 3S-1 W 50 8 18 Liew & Grant Ledger & Hannah
2 7 3S-2 W 100 17 9 Moore & Serby Strachan & Carter
Board 15
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 2 4S+1 S 650 19 7 Liew & Grant Moore & Serby
5 4 5Sx= N 850 24 2 Oakford & Oakford Solomon & Solomon
10 6 4S= S 620 13 13 Thomas & Goodman Ledger & Hannah
1 7 4Sx+1 S 990 26 0 Thrower & Miller Strachan & Carter
3 8 4Sx= S 790 22 4 Stock & Silverstone Tomlinson & Lawy
Board 16
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
9 2 4S= N 420 8 18 Liew & Grant Moore & Serby
5 4 4S= N 420 8 18 Oakford & Oakford Solomon & Solomon
10 6 4S+1 S 450 22 4 Thomas & Goodman Ledger & Hannah
1 7 4S= N 420 8 18 Thrower & Miller Strachan & Carter
3 8 4S= N 420 8 18 Stock & Silverstone Tomlinson & Lawy
Board 17
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 3 4H+2 S 480 22 4 Thrower & Miller Stock & Silverstone
6 5 3H= S 140 11 15 Ledger & Hannah Oakford & Oakford
10 7 3H= S 140 11 15 Thomas & Goodman Strachan & Carter
2 8 4S-3 E 150 15 11 Moore & Serby Tomlinson & Lawy
4 9 4H-1 S -50 7 19 Solomon & Solomon Liew & Grant
Board 18
NS EW Contract Dec Lead Score MP MP NS EW
1 3 3NT+3 E -490 2 24 Thrower & Miller Stock & Silverstone
6 5 6H-1 W 50 19 7 Ledger & Hannah Oakford & Oakford
10 7 6NT-1 E 50 19 7 Thomas & Goodman Strachan & Carter
2 8 6H-1 W 50 19 7 Moore & Serby Tomlinson & Lawy
4 9 6H-1 W 50 19 7 Solomon & Solomon Liew & Grant